![icecat vs iceweasel icecat vs iceweasel](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/59/9c/ff/599cff633b1e08b84c4291ea6f667504.jpg)
- #ICECAT VS ICEWEASEL ANDROID#
- #ICECAT VS ICEWEASEL SOFTWARE#
- #ICECAT VS ICEWEASEL CODE#
- #ICECAT VS ICEWEASEL SERIES#
Basically they feared that patches they had no control over might be buggy or alter the browsers behavior and they would be blamed while having no influence on it.ġ2.04 LTS (1) 1280x1024 (2) 14.1 (1) absolute (6) accessibility (6) ad-blocking (2) administration (2) afterstep (1) android (3) announcements (14) anonymity (5) anonymous (1) anonymous browsing (1) anti-malware (1) anti-virus (1) antiX (3) applications (1) arch (11) archbang (11) archone (1) artix (2) authentication (1) backports (1) base (1) bash (2) bittorrent (2) block-this (1) bluestar (1) bodhi (1) books (1) brave (1) brave-browser (1) browsers (8) browsing (1) bsd (4) bug (2) bugs (3) calculate (1) centos (1) certification (1) chakra (2) changelog (22) chat (1) chatzilla (1) chromebook (1) chromium (2) click (1) commodore 64 (1) ControlD (1) critique (1) crunchbang (5) crux (1) ctkarch (1) cyber war (1) debian (29) desktop (62) devuan (5) digital certificates (1) digital memories (1) distributions (75) DNS (1) documentaries (1) documentation (2) dr. If this product had retained its name and logo Mozilla would have still remained associated with it, but it seems feared they had little influence on Debian development.
![icecat vs iceweasel icecat vs iceweasel](https://alchetron.com/cdn/gnu-icecat-c76bb88c-4328-4d52-b4f6-76076c6ca1c-resize-750.jpg)
#ICECAT VS ICEWEASEL CODE#
Essentially a Firefox 2 in Debian would have been around a lot longer than the Firefox 2 released by Mozilla, with its code more and more removed from the original Firefox 2. In addition Mozilla asked, if Debian retained the Firefox brand, for all patches to be run by and authorised by Mozilla, as Debian specific patches would alter the code of the product Mozilla had originally released. To do otherwise was deemed a trademark violation. The newly created Mozilla Corporation, as opposed to the Mozilla Foundation who had previously seemingly condoned use of the Firefox name with a different logo (Deer Park), did not like the Debian policy of backporting security patches to their old releases in the stable branch rather than upgrading Firefox to the new version, and was also of the opinion that to use the name Firefox would also require the use of the trademarked icon and logo (see bugreport opened by Mozilla, status: serious). During the development cycle and shortly before Debian 4.0 'Etch' was to go into freeze Mozilla asked the Debian project to review their use of the Firefox brand and logo "before you put out another long-lived release".
#ICECAT VS ICEWEASEL SOFTWARE#
The Chromium package for example also disables various "phone-home" features many packages include backported bug fixes, and changes to integrate the software into the distribution.Iceweasel is the renamed Debian version of Firefox.
![icecat vs iceweasel icecat vs iceweasel](https://objects.icecat.biz/objects/mmo_29727869_1466580220_635_32606.jpg)
adding a "Debian" mention in version numbers in gcc and Wine). These are the kinds of changes you could find in any package in Debian (the old branding changes weren't, of course, although quite a few Debian packages include minor branding changes - e.g.
#ICECAT VS ICEWEASEL SERIES#
There are also a series of bug fixes backported from work-in-progress upstream versions. You'll find changes which disable "phone-home" features (Firefox health report), change the way plugins and extensions are handled to work better in the context of a distribution with packaged plugins and extensions. There are some non-cosmetic differences between Mozilla's version and Debian's you can see all the patches here. There's an Iceweasel branding add-on which can be used to restore the Iceweasel branding. In Debian, Iceweasel is Firefox once again, since March 10, 2016.